Arduino for STM32

The FreeRTOS library allows to add a config file at the sketch level. This is very convenient. However, there are settings that pose problems, and I would be pleased if someone could explain me the reason. I am using a generic STM32F103 board, with a STM32F103RBT6 chip. I have set the options in the...

I did it, and it works! Thanks a lot!

Sorry, I omitted an important information. I am not using a SD card shield, but a Olimexino STM32 board (Maple-like) that has a built-in SD card fixture. This one does not use the Arduino pins 10 through 13, but instead what they call D25, D32, D33 and D34, which correspond to the SPI2 (pins PD2, PB...

I checked the Arduino SD library. It compiles. However, the pin allocation is wrong, since the STM32 is not defined in the file SD2Pinmap.h. Curiously, no compile error is produced. I suppose that __arm__ is defined somewhere, which makes the library think the board is an Arduino Due. This library m...

Ok I overlooked this requirement. I am porting a sketch that worked with Roger's core, the SD card being supported by the SDFat library. So this library did not use the SDIO feature of the STM32F103. Actually, it just used a SPI. Now, is there another library that will allow me to interface my SD ca...

Hi, I am testing the example file STM32SD/examples/ReadWrite/ReadWrite.ino. I have installed the library FatFs, and I selected the following compile options: Generic STM32F1 board, Board part number F103RBT6, UART enabled, CDC generic enabled. I get the following compile error: In file included from...

Hi, for the sake of debugging, I need to check whether a stack overflow would occur in a multitasking sketch. I am using STM32FreeRTOS version 9.0.4. In the FreeRTOS configuration I activated the option configCHECK_FOR_STACK_OVERFLOW, and I added in my sketch a function as follows: extern "C&qu...

In the description of the issue, I suggested two ways to overcome it. I thought that the author would have a preference of his own, and I wanted to wait for his advice before going any further. On my part, I (at least temporarily) have implemented the easiest way that fulfils my needs.

Thanks a lot. I could install a newer version without impacting the previous one.

I certainly would not issue a pull request without having very carefully thought of the fix to be done, and without having checked it. In this case, I admit it could be helpful to everyone, since the bug is not related to a certain type of microcontroller. What I think is just that I did a test that...