Proposal: move system/libstm to core folder

The official STMicroelectronics Arduino core
User avatar
Wi6Labs
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 11:39 am
Location: Rennes, France
Contact:

Re: Proposal: move system/libstm to core folder

Postby Wi6Labs » Mon Nov 14, 2016 12:54 pm

Thank you danieleff for all this work.

Our preliminary tests are conclusive in spit of some regression for the Nucleo variant.
We will now work on this new architecture for the STM32F103RB Nucleo board.
Our tests will be limited to the Nucleo variant. Thank you for your understanding.

BR
Wi6Labs team

fpiSTM
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 12:33 pm
Location: Le Mans, France

Re: Proposal: move system/libstm to core folder

Postby fpiSTM » Thu Jan 05, 2017 10:52 am



Hi @danieleff,
I'm currently preparing release for other STM32 core and I tried to follow the community feedback and work.
So many thanks for your work ;).
I have one question about the cleanup, why is it important to rename to "staticlibstm32f1"? Is it because you previously rename it "libstm32f103c"? If true, I could kept original name "libstm32f1".

thanks in advance

danieleff
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 8:52 pm
Location: Hungary
Contact:

Re: Proposal: move system/libstm to core folder

Postby danieleff » Thu Jan 05, 2017 11:12 am

fpiSTM wrote:


Hi @danieleff,
I'm currently preparing release for other STM32 core and I tried to follow the community feedback and work.
So many thanks for your work ;).
I have one question about the cleanup, why is it important to rename to "staticlibstm32f1"? Is it because you previously rename it "libstm32f103c"? If true, I could kept original name "libstm32f1".

thanks in advance

Only because that way there would be 2 folders named libstm32f1, one in cores/arduino, other one in system.
I just wanted to distinguish between the two, it is not that important.


Return to “STM Core”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest